Celiac Disease in an Urban VA Population with Iron Deficiency:  The Case Against Routine Duodenal Biopsy

Celiac Disease in an Urban VA Population with Iron Deficiency: The Case Against Routine Duodenal Biopsy

  • نوع فایل : کتاب
  • زبان : انگلیسی
  • مؤلف : Rami Abbass Marc Hopkins D. Robert Dufour Jason Schallheim Oliver J. Szeto Louis Y. Korman Richard L. Amdur Timothy O. Lipman
  • چاپ و سال / کشور: 2011

Description

Background Celiac disease is considered an under-recognized cause of iron deficiency. Small intestinal biopsy is proposed to be part of routine evaluation for iron deficiency. Aims To determine the prevalence of celiac disease in an urban, mostly male, mostly minority population with iron deficiency. Methods Clinical, endoscopic, and pathologic records of veterans who had undergone esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and duodenal biopsy for iron deficiency at an urban, tertiary care Veterans Affairs Medical Center were reviewed. The yield of positive duodenal biopsies for celiac disease and pre-defined clinically important findings on EGD were calculated. Confounding factors were assessed in multivariate analysis. The main outcome measures were prevalence of celiac disease and prevalence of clinically important findings on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Results The records of 310 veterans were reviewed. Mean age was 63, range 32–91 years old. Most were male (89%) and African–American (73%). Five of 306 small intestinal biopsies were consistent with celiac disease (type 1 lesions), but tissue transglutaminase obtained in four of the patients was normal, making the prevalence of potential celiac disease 0.33% (95% CI: 0.06–1.83%). Fifty of 310 EGDs demonstrated findings that were considered to have a moderate or high probability of producing iron deficiency (16.1, 95% CI: 12.5–20.6%). Conclusions The prevalence of celiac disease is low in an urban, predominately male, African–American population with iron deficiency. Routine small intestinal biopsy for celiac disease in similar populations should not be done. EGD remains clinically important
Dig Dis Sci (2011) 56:2037–2041 DOI 10.1007/s10620-010-1549-y Received: 16 April 2010 / Accepted: 22 December 2010 / Published online: 11 January 2011
اگر شما نسبت به این اثر یا عنوان محق هستید، لطفا از طریق "بخش تماس با ما" با ما تماس بگیرید و برای اطلاعات بیشتر، صفحه قوانین و مقررات را مطالعه نمایید.

دیدگاه کاربران


لطفا در این قسمت فقط نظر شخصی در مورد این عنوان را وارد نمایید و در صورتیکه مشکلی با دانلود یا استفاده از این فایل دارید در صفحه کاربری تیکت ثبت کنید.

بارگزاری