Trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference correlated with neuroretinal rim area in glaucoma
- نوع فایل : کتاب
- زبان : انگلیسی
- مؤلف : Ruojin Ren & Ningli Wang & Xiaojun Zhang & Tongtong Cui & Jost B. Jonas
- چاپ و سال / کشور: 2011
Description
Background The aim of this work is to prospectively assess the relationship between trans-laminar cribrosa pressure difference and neuroretinal rim area as morphologic surrogate of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Methods The study included 22 patients with high-pressure glaucoma, 13 patients with normal-pressure glaucoma, and 17 subjects with ocular hypertension. All participants underwent a standardized ophthalmologic examination including confocal laser scanning tomography of the optic nerve head and computerized perimetry and a neurologic examination including measurement of the lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure. The trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference was calculated as difference of intraocular pressure minus lumbar CSF pressure. Results Neuroretinal rim area (p=0.006; correlation coefficient r=-0.38) and mean visual field defect (p=0.008; r= 0.38) were significantly associated with trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference. The probability of error was lower (i.e., the p value were lower) and the correlation coefficients were higher for the associations between rim area/visual field defect with trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference than for the associations between rim area/visual field defect and intraocular pressure or lumbar CSF pressure. Conclusions The trans-lamina cribrosa pressure difference as the difference of intraocular pressure minus the lumbar CSF pressure was the main pressure parameter associated with the amount of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. This may suggest that the CSF pressure as trans-lamina cribrosa counter pressure against the intraocular pressure may play some role in the pathogenesis of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (2011) 249:1057–1063 DOI 10.1007/s00417-011-1657-1 Received: 19 August 2010 / Revised: 9 January 2011 / Accepted: 18 February 2011 / Published online: 1 April 2011
