Cost-effectiveness of Denosumab for the treatment  of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Cost-effectiveness of Denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

  • نوع فایل : کتاب
  • زبان : انگلیسی
  • مؤلف : B. Jِnsson & O. Strِm & J. A. Eisman & A. Papaioannou & E. S. Siris & A. Tosteson & J. A. Kanis
  • چاپ و سال / کشور: 2010

Description

Summary Denosumab is an injectable drug that reduces the risk of fractures. The objective was to estimate the costeffectiveness of denosumab in a Swedish setting, also accounting for poor adherence to treatment. Denosumab is cost-effective, particularly for patients at high risk of fracture and low adherence to oral treatments. Introduction Denosumab is a novel biologic agent developed for the treatment of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures that has been shown to reduce the risk of fractures in a phase III trial. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of denosumab from a societal perspective compared with generic alendronate, branded risedronate, strontium ranelate, and no treatment in a Swedish setting. Methods A Markov cohort model was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of denosumab given for up to 5 years to a typical Swedish patient population (women aged 71 years, T-score..2.5 SD and a prevalence of morphometric vertebral fractures of 34%). The model included treatment persistence and residual effect after discontinuation assumed to be equal to the time on treatment. Persistence with the comparator treatments and with denosumab was derived from prescription data and a persistence study, respectively. Results The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated at .27,000, .12,000, .5,000, and .14,000, for denosumab compared with generic alendronate, risedronate, strontium ranelate, and no treatment, respectively. Suboptimal persistence had the greatest impact in the comparison with generic alendronate, where the difference in drug cost was large. Conclusion Improving persistence with osteoporosis treatment impacts positively on cost-effectiveness with a larger number of fractures avoided in the population targeted for treatment. Denosumab is a cost-effective alternative to oral osteoporosis treatments, particularly for patients at high risk of fracture and low expected adherence to oral treatments.
Osteoporos Int (2011) 22:967–982 DOI 10.1007/s00198-010-1424-x Received: 1 July 2010 / Accepted: 13 September 2010 / Published online: 9 October 2010
اگر شما نسبت به این اثر یا عنوان محق هستید، لطفا از طریق "بخش تماس با ما" با ما تماس بگیرید و برای اطلاعات بیشتر، صفحه قوانین و مقررات را مطالعه نمایید.

دیدگاه کاربران


لطفا در این قسمت فقط نظر شخصی در مورد این عنوان را وارد نمایید و در صورتیکه مشکلی با دانلود یا استفاده از این فایل دارید در صفحه کاربری تیکت ثبت کنید.

بارگزاری